Skip Navigation

IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 2006 E89-D(3):1128-1138; doi:10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1128
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NAKAJIMA, S.
Right arrow Articles by WATANABE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2006 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers

Regular Section-- Papers -- Algorithm Theory

Generalization Performance of Subspace Bayes Approach in Linear Neural Networks

Shinichi NAKAJIMA1,2 and Sumio WATANABE1

1 The authors are with Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama-shi, 226–8503 Japan. E-mail: nakajima.s{at}cs.pi.titech.ac.jp, E-mail: swatanab{at}pi.titech.ac.jp, 2 The author is with Nikon Corporation, Kumagaya-shi, 360–8559 Japan.

In unidentifiable models, the Bayes estimation has the advantage of generalization performance over the maximum likelihood estimation. However, accurate approximation of the posterior distribution requires huge computational costs. In this paper, we consider an alternative approximation method, which we call a subspace Bayes approach. A subspace Bayes approach is an empirical Bayes approach where a part of the parameters are regarded as hyperparameters. Consequently, in some three-layer models, this approach requires much less computational costs than Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We show that, in three-layer linear neural networks, a subspace Bayes approach is asymptotically equivalent to a positive-part James-Stein type shrinkage estimation, and theoretically clarify its generalization error and training error. We also discuss the domination over the maximum likelihood estimation and the relation to the variational Bayes approach.

Key Words: empirical Bayes, variational Bayes, neural networks, reduced-rank regression, James-Stein, unidentifiable


Manuscript received May 10, 2005. Manuscript revised August 24, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.