Skip Navigation

IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 2007 E90-D(5):868-871; doi:10.1093/ietisy/e90-d.5.868
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JEONG, S.
Right arrow Articles by HAHN, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2007 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers

Regular Section -- Letters -- Speech and Hearing

Response Time Reduction of Speech Recognizers Using Single Gaussians

Sangbae JEONG1, Hoirin KIM1 and Minsoo HAHN1

1 The authors are with the Faculty of Information and Communications University (ICU), Daejeon, 305–732 Korea. E-mail: sangbae{at}icu.ac.kr


  Abstract

In this paper, we propose a useful algorithm that can be applied to reduce the response time of speech recognizers based on HMM's. In our algorithm, to reduce the response time, promising HMM states are selected by single Gaussians. In speech recognition, HMM state likelihoods are evaluated by the corresponding single Gaussians first, and then likelihoods by original full Gaussians are computed and replaced only for the HMM states having relatively large likelihoods. By doing so, we can reduce the pattern-matching time for speech recognition significantly without any noticeable loss of the recognition rate. In addition, we cluster the single Gaussians into groups by measuring the distance between Gaussians. Therefore, we can reduce the extra memory much more. In our 10,000 word Korean POI (point-of-interest) recognition task, our proposed algorithm shows 35.57% reduction of the response time in comparison with that of the baseline system at the cost of 10% degradation of the WER.

Key Words: speech recognition, fast likelihood computation

Manuscript received August 2, 2006. Manuscript revised December 19, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.