Skip Navigation

IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 2008 E91-D(11):2746-2750; doi:10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.11.2746
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KWON, S.-B.
Right arrow Articles by KIM, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2008 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers

Regular Section -- Letters -- Speech and Hearing

Utterance Verification Using Word Voiceprint Models Based on Probabilistic Distributions of Phone-Level Log-Likelihood Ratio and Phone Duration

Suk-Bong KWON1 and HoiRin KIM1

1 The authors are with Information and Communications University, Daejeon, Korea. E-mail: sbkwon{at}icu.ac.kr


   Abstract

This paper suggests word voiceprint models to verify the recognition results obtained from a speech recognition system. Word voiceprint models have word-dependent information based on the distributions of phone-level log-likelihood ratio and duration. Thus, we can obtain a more reliable confidence score for a recognized word by using its word voiceprint models that represent the more proper characteristics of utterance verification for the word. Additionally, when obtaining a log-likelihood ratio-based word voiceprint score, this paper proposes a new log-scale normalization function using the distribution of the phone-level log-likelihood ratio, instead of the sigmoid function widely used in obtaining a phone-level log-likelihood ratio. This function plays a role of emphasizing a mis-recognized phone in a word. This individual information of a word is used to help achieve a more discriminative score against out-of-vocabulary words. The proposed method requires additional memory, but it shows that the relative reduction in equal error rate is 16.9% compared to the baseline system using simple phone log-likelihood ratios.

Key Words: utterance verification, confidence measure, likelihood ratio testing, word voiceprint


Manuscript received February 29, 2008. Manuscript revised June 17, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.